Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block & Shoulder Block for Postoperative Analgesia for Shoulder Surgeries

Shoulder arthroscopic surgeries can produce intense postoperative pain. Interscalene block provides good analgesia after shoulder surgery, but concerns over its associated risks have prompted the search for alternatives. Suprascapular block along with axillary nerve block was recently proposed as an alternative to interscalene block, but evidence of its comparative efficacy is conflicting. The aim of our study was to compare suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks with interscalene block in shoulder surgery for postoperative analgesia. Methods: A total of 76 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopic surgery were equally divided into two groups of 38patients each: Interscalene (ISB) group and suprascapular with axillary nerve (SHB) group. Both the nerve block was achieved by both ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance. Visual analogue scale score was evaluated at 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. The time to first analgesia request, total analgesic requirement for 24 hr postoperatively, patient satisfaction, and any complications were recorded. Results: SHB provided equivalent analgesia to ISB in terms of post operative VAS scores.Time to 1st analgesia request was 7.2±1.3 hr in ISB group and 5.9±1.2 hr in SHB group which was not statistically significant.Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in SHB group compared to ISB group. Complication like subjective dyspnea and weakness of arm was significantly higher in ISB group compared to SHB group. Conclusions: SHB was as effective as ISB for postoperative pain relief but with fewer complications due to selective blockade of suprascapular and axillary nerve.

Minimum effective concentration of bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block guided by ultrasound / Concentração mínima efetiva de bupivacaína para o bloqueio do plexo braquial via axilar guiado por ultrassom / Concentración mínima efectiva de bupivacaína para el bloqueo del plexo braquial vía axilar guiado por ecografía

INTRODUCTION: The use of ultrasound in regional anesthesia allows reducing the dose of local anesthetic used for peripheral nerve block. The present study was performed to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block. METHODS: Patients undergoing hand surgery were recruited. To estimate the MEC90, a sequential up-down biased coin method of allocation was used. The bupivacaine dose was 5 mL for each nerve (radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous). The initial concentration was 0.35%. This concentration was changed by 0.05% depending on the previous block; a blockade failure resulted in increased concentration for the next patient; in case of success, the next patient could receive or reduction (0.1 probability) or the same concentration (0.9 probability). Surgical anesthesia was defined as driving force ≤2 according to the modified Bromage scale, lack of thermal sensitivity and response to pinprick. Postoperative analgesia was assessed in the recovery room with numeric pain scale and the amount of drugs used within 4 h after the blockade. RESULTS: MEC90 was 0.241% [R 2: 0.978, confidence interval: 0.20-0.34%]. No patient, with successful block, reported pain after 4 h. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block can be performed with the use of low concentration of local anesthetics, increasing the safety of the procedure. Further studies should be conducted to assess blockade duration at low concentrations. .

INTRODUÇÃO: O uso do ultrassom na anestesia regional permite a redução da dose de anestésico local utilizada para o bloqueio de nervos periféricos. O presente estudo foi conduzido com o objetivo de determinar a concentração mínima efetiva (CME90) de bupivacaína para o bloqueio do plexo braquial via axilar (BPVA). MÉTODOS: Pacientes submetidos a cirurgias da mão foram recrutados. Foi usado um método de alocação "biased coin" seqüencial "up-down" para estimar a CME90. A dose de bupivacaína foi de 5 mL para cada nervo (radial, ulnar, mediano e musculocutâneo). A concentração inicial de era 0,35%. Essa concentração era alterada em 0,05% dependendo do bloqueio anterior: a falha do bloqueio resultava em aumento da concentração para o próximo paciente; no caso de sucesso, o próximo paciente poderia receber ou redução (probabilidade de 0,1) ou mesma concentração (probabilidade 0,9). A anestesia cirúrgica foi definida como força motora ≤ 2 segundo a escala de Bromage modificada, ausência de sensibilidade térmica e de resposta ao pinprick. A analgesia pós-operatória foi verificada na sala de recuperação anestésica com escala numérica de dor e a quantidade de analgésicos utilizados até 4 horas após o bloqueio. RESULTADOS: A CME90 foi de 0,241% [R2: 0,978, Intervalo de Confiança: 0,20%-0,34%]. Além disso, nenhum paciente com sucesso do bloqueio apresentou dor após 4 horas. CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo demonstrou que pode-se realizar o BPVA guiado por ultrassom utilizando-se baixas concentrações de anestésico local, aumentando a segurança do procedimento. Novos estudos devem ser realizados para avaliar a duração de bloqueios com baixas concentrações. .

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso de la ecografía en la anestesia regional permite la reducción de la dosis de anestésico local utilizada para el bloqueo de nervios periféricos. El presente estudio fue llevado a cabo con el objetivo de determinar la concentración mínima efectiva (CME90) de bupivacaína para el bloqueo del plexo braquial vía axilar. MÉTODOS: Fueron reclutados pacientes sometidos a cirugías de la mano. Se usó un método de ubicación "biased coin" secuencial "up-down" para estimar la CME90. La dosis de bupivacaína fue de 5 mL para cada nervio (radial, cubital, mediano y musculocutáneo). La concentración inicial era de un 0,35%. Esa concentración era alterada en un 0,05% dependiendo del bloqueo anterior: El fallo del bloqueo revertía en un aumento de la concentración al próximo paciente; en caso de éxito, el próximo paciente podría recibir o una reducción (probabilidad de 0,1) o la misma concentración (probabilidad 0,9). La anestesia quirúrgica fue definida como fuerza motora ≤ 2 según la escala de Bromage modificada, ausencia de sensibilidad térmica y de respuesta al pinprick (test del pinchazo de la aguja). La analgesia postoperatoria fue verificada en la sala de recuperación anestésica con la escala numérica de dolor y la cantidad de analgésicos utilizados hasta 4 h después del bloqueo. RESULTADOS: La CME90 fue del 0,241% [R2: 0,978, intervalo de confianza: 0,20-0,34%]. Además, ningún paciente con éxito en el bloqueo tuvo dolor después de 4 h. CONCLUSIÓN: Este estudio demostró que se puede realizar el bloqueo del plexo braquial vía axilar guiado por ecografía utilizando bajas concentraciones de anestésico local, aumentando la seguridad del procedimiento. Nuevos estudios deben ser realizados para calcular la duración de bloqueos con bajas concentraciones. .

Comparative study of bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine along with buprenorphine in axillary brachial plexus block: a prospective, randomized, single blind study.

Background: Different additives have been used to prolong brachial plexus block. We performed a prospective, randomized single-blind study to compare Bupivacaine alone and Bupivacaine along with Buprenorphine for onset, quality, and duration of block as well as post-operative analgesia and any complication in axillary brachial- plexus block. Methods: Randomized controlled study was carried out among 60 patients of either sex, aged 20-60 years. ASA grade I or II undergoing elective hand, forearm, elbow surgery under axillary brachial plexus block. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group-l received 30 ml of 0.35% Bupivacaine alone in axillary block. Group-II received 30 ml of 0.35% Bupivacaine with 3µg/kg Buprenorphine in axillary block. Time taken for onset and completion of motor and sensory block as well as complete duration of block were noted in both groups. Any complication during procedure, during surgery as well as post-operatively were noted and treated. Results: Addition of Buprenorphine (3µg/kg) to Bupivacaine mixture in peripheral nerve block did not affected the onset time for motor as well as sensory block. Mean duration of motor block was 284.33±78.94 mins. in group I and in group II 307.33±60.26 mins. Mean duration of sensory block 305.066±83.64 mins. in group I while 580.166±111.45 mins. in group II. It suggests duration of sensory block was prolonged in group II then group I. Conclusions: Addition of Buprenorphine to local anesthetic drug provides good post-operative analgesia. Buprenorphine significantly prolongs sensory block and lengthens duration of analgesia without prolonging duration of motor block.

Effect of warmed ropivacaine solution on onset and duration of axillary block / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Bicarbonate, as an adjunct increasing the non-ionized form of local anesthetics, can reduce latency and prolong duration of regional nerve block. Warming of local anesthetics decreases pKa and also increases the non-ionized form of local anesthetics. We warmed ropivacaine to body temperature (37degrees C) and evaluated the sensory block onset time, motor block onset time and analgesic duration of axillary block. METHODS: Patients were consecutively allocated to two groups of 22 patients each. Ropivacaine 150 mg (30 ml) at 20degrees C (room temperature) and 150 mg (30 ml) at 37degrees C (body temperature) was injected in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Sensory block and motor block was assessed every 5 minutes, for 30 minutes after injection. The duration of analgesia was recorded after operation. RESULTS: In group 2, the onset times of both sensory and motor block of the radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerves were significantly reduced, compared to group 1. Also, the number of blocked nerves was increased in group 2, within 30 minutes after injection. Analgesia lasted for 2 hours longer in group 2, compared to group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Warming of ropivacaine to 37degrees C can reduce the onset time of both sensory and motor block, during axillary block.

Unrecognized intraneural injection as a possible cause of nerve injury associated with axillary block : A case report

A 71-year-old man who had a laceration on his right fifth finger underwent an emergency explorative operation under brachial plexus block that was performed by using transaxillary artery technique.During axillary block, no elicitation of paresthesia was presented.Postoperatively he complained numbness on his right arm along the dermatome of 7th cervical nerve distribution.Two weeks later the evidence of nerve injury was found on EMG and NCV carried by the department of neurology. Observing closely for another two weeks, the symptoms and signs were gradually improved.On 42nd postoperative day, the patient complained no neurologic problems and the findings of EMG and NCV returned to normal.Considering the method of anesthesia, operation time, tourniquet time and patient position, we conclude that the direct needle injury and intraneural injection during axillary block are the highly suggestive causes of nerve injury.

Unrecognized intraneural injection as a possible cause of nerve injury associated with axillary block : A case report

A 71-year-old man who had a laceration on his right fifth finger underwent an emergency explorative operation under brachial plexus block that was performed by using transaxillary artery technique.During axillary block, no elicitation of paresthesia was presented.Postoperatively he complained numbness on his right arm along the dermatome of 7th cervical nerve distribution.Two weeks later the evidence of nerve injury was found on EMG and NCV carried by the department of neurology. Observing closely for another two weeks, the symptoms and signs were gradually improved.On 42nd postoperative day, the patient complained no neurologic problems and the findings of EMG and NCV returned to normal.Considering the method of anesthesia, operation time, tourniquet time and patient position, we conclude that the direct needle injury and intraneural injection during axillary block are the highly suggestive causes of nerve injury.